|
|
Post by Sherry on Nov 29, 2006 21:56:20 GMT -5
Grrrr...I just missed all but 5 minutes...Anybody catch the whole thing? How many lies did they tell this time  |
|
|
|
Post by notadogfan on Dec 3, 2006 15:06:31 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Sherry on Dec 3, 2006 15:59:35 GMT -5
Thank you so much Ann. Everything A.L. would need to sue for slander/libel is right there in that article. It's amazing that that idiot is so stupid to get up there and say that after all this time knowing that the possibility of a lawsuit is imminent. He can't claim to have believed it was true because he read or heard it in the media when he HIMSELF was the SOURCE of it! |
|
|
|
Post by notadogfan on Dec 3, 2006 17:01:06 GMT -5
Your welcome, Sherry. Someone in another forum mentioned the video being available. I hope to figure out what is wrong with my speaker soon so I can listen to the video.
Did you see in the transcripts where there is going to be a Dawg special on A&E on December 12th?
Been over to the MSN site today and noticed the transcripts are being discusssed there and someone posted them too.
|
|
|
|
Post by Sherry on Dec 4, 2006 22:23:13 GMT -5
Ok, he's on Greta now. They're lying again- their lips are moving. Somebody tape this. My VCR is broke. I don't think the dawg is the only one using. She is stoned. OK, as I'm writing this the fat whore just said it all again. She repeated everything. Jackpot! She just lied and said she didn't smuggle the live feed in for Geraldo. That was admitted by Geraldo. What a fat lying pig. I'm sorry. I have no respect for that scum and I'm not going to pretend to.
|
|
|
|
Post by notadogfan on Dec 4, 2006 23:27:54 GMT -5
Unfortunately, I read about this show tonight too late to send notice or get my VCR tape ready. In fact, I rely too much online about being able to view videos or read transcripts so I'm not even sure how to tape from my newer VCR/DVD.
I will check for online video or transcript. I hope there is one because I was able to watch most of the show and agree they were lying, especially Beth this time (speaking mostly for Dawg) with her comments about ghb and handcuffs being found in Luster's motel room and that he was raping women in Mexico. I like to think of this duo as the Mutt and the Slutt (because Beth pursued a married and fathered Dawgie) and the Dog and the Hog.
What is it about the Geraldo comment? I'm new to learning about Dawg and Luster and don't get it.
Modify:
Forgot to mention that I read about this show tonight very late and at the MSN forum mentioned earlier somewhere in this forum. They have a lively discussion and debate going on. I haven't posted in a few days.
By the way, on the Greta show tonight, did anyone notice (how could you not) Beth's very tight and low cut top? That woman needs to dress more appropriately.
|
|
|
|
Post by notadogfan on Dec 6, 2006 21:18:36 GMT -5
I checked last night and this morning and cannot find an actual transcription for the Dawgie drama on Greta at FNC. However, some people at an MSN forum have linked to a video and a 2-3 paragraph blog entry by Greta the day after show. The video about Dawg is approx. 3/4 down on the left hand side of the page: www.foxnews.com/ontherecord/index.htmlGreta's blog the day after the show where she mentions some of Dawg's and Hawg's lies. www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,234522,00.html MSN forum where I found the links. There are some 800+ pages of lively posts going on between fans and nonfans of Dawgie, as well as many comments about Andrew Luster and some links referencing this website along with others such as Bounty Hunter Lance Wilkinson's site at www.beagent.com. He is a critic of Dawg and Litter. boards.msn.com/MSNBCboards/thread.aspx?ThreadID=90575&BoardsParam=Page=573 |
|
|
|
Post by notadogfan on Dec 6, 2006 21:33:33 GMT -5
Follow up by Ann/Notadogfan
Sherry,
It's late and I must go to bed soon. Overtired. Problems with the thread and if I cannot edit tonight and correct any links, I will try my best to do so in the morning.
Ann
|
|
|
|
Post by Sherry on Dec 6, 2006 22:38:14 GMT -5
Is that the whole video, Ann? My player stopped at the commercial before the hawg started to talk. I actually saw it so I know it was longer than that.
|
|
|
|
Post by notadogfan on Dec 7, 2006 0:12:07 GMT -5
The sound still isn't working on my online player so I didn't actually watch this video online. Sorry. I did watch it on TV like you did. I'll try to fix my sound again and see if I can watch the video with sound. Might be tomorrow before I check in. At that MSN site they've been discussing this and discussed more the Larry King video. The forum is over 800 pages now and I'm having a difficult time keeping up with the reading and haven't actually posted beyond page 570+ with the same user name.
|
|
|
|
Post by notadogfan on Dec 7, 2006 13:25:06 GMT -5
Sherry, I fixed my speaker and watched the video. You're right. It only showed a portion of the segment where the Chapmans were on. I tried to fix the link to Greta's blog and I don't know why part of the link is not highlighted and working. I copied the entire link twice and tried to post. Here is a section of Greta's blog where she talks about the Chapmans being on: We had Duane "Dog" Chapman on our show last night. His story is a strange one. Andrew Luster, accused of dozens of rape charges (more than 75?), vanishes (jumps bond) during his trial and goes to Mexico. Chapman goes over the border into Mexico and gets him — which is against the Mexican law — and brings him back to the United States to answer to the rape charges and now Luster is in prison. Presumably, Mexican women are now safe, since Luster — from facts presented at his trial — is a serial rapist. The problem? Mexico is furious that Chapman violated their law. They asked the United States to arrest Chapman (the U.S. did) and bring Chapman back to Mexico to answer charges (not yet done... Chapman is currently on release while the matter gets reviewed.) The lawful, by-the-book way to handle Luster's flight would have been for the Mexican authorities to arrest Luster and turn him over to the United States and the United States return Luster to California to finish his trial and answer to the verdict. Since that was not done by the U.S., bounty hunter Chapman took over the matter. So here is my question to you: What do you think of this? Should Chapman be sent to Mexico to answer to the charge? The Chapman story has a fascinating international political and legal element to it. I am curious what our State Department will do — if anything. Of course this is complicated by the fact that it is Mexico — we do have big immigration problems with Mexico and other issues with them. Victims of the rape should get justice and people need to be protected from criminals, but can we have Americans going into other countries nabbing even criminals? There are many issues raised by this story. And here is a thought: If the U.S. decides against sending Chapman back to face the Mexican allegations, will Mexico do some 'self help' (Chapman style) and send a bounty hunter into U.S. to do the same? And then what? You tell me — e-mail me. Check this video out — and don’t blame me, it was sent to me by my assistant. Her father sent it to her. www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,234522,00.html |
|
|
|
Post by notadogfan on Dec 7, 2006 15:43:25 GMT -5
|
|
