tator
Full Member
Posts: 136
|
Post by tator on Jul 13, 2003 1:40:27 GMT -5
That's my middle of the road. Lusters guilty, Dog has no right to avything at all.
|
|
|
Post by Stupid on Jul 13, 2003 1:43:10 GMT -5
a second opinion, that's funny
|
|
|
Post by stagetec on Jul 13, 2003 11:34:28 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Sherry on Jul 13, 2003 12:23:39 GMT -5
Is that your only contribution here That's nothing but a repeat of every other media article. Woo hoo! It proves NOTHING beyond the bias and demonizatin of an innocent man on the part of the media in this case. Try again. Maybe you'll make a valid point. Even a stopped clock is right twice a day I think it's a male thing between you and Truth. When I say basically the same thing he does,you don't seem to have problem with it. Stupid just goes back and forth. Just whichever way the wind happens to be blowing at the moment. I guess we need ----- here to keep her honest. Hypothetical-So, if you have sex with your wife or girlfriend, then fall asleep, is she guilty of violating your consent if she touches you after you fall asleep? Or in the reverse, if you touch her, does that then qualify as "sexual assault" because she was asleep? Isn't it reasonable after some point, in the proper context, setting, and circumstances, to presume that consent is implied or that he or she could've honestly interpretted it to be? I'm trying not to be vulgar and still make my point and it's not easy
|
|
|
Post by stagetec on Jul 13, 2003 17:04:54 GMT -5
sherry not everyone that reads all the post ,know who Andrew Lusters is,the news articals tells us whats on the tapes.As for mr Luster,seems he was douing more then just touching some one after they were passed out.That is where he got into trouble with the law.BTW i have no problem with the truth,he can post what he want on this board.I for one respect his or your right to freedom of speach.
|
|
LUSTER
Junior Member
Posts: 93
|
Post by LUSTER on Jul 13, 2003 17:09:27 GMT -5
[glow=red,2,300]SOCIALISTWORKER.ORG??[/glow] Is this where you get your information!!? Alright Stalin (a.k.a. stagetec) you are officially one of the dumbest posters I have ever had the displeasure of coming across. p.s. Hi Stupid!
|
|
|
Post by stagetec on Jul 13, 2003 17:14:03 GMT -5
luster lmao stalin? ?? I just ran across the news pices.WOW im sad you called me a name.
|
|
LUSTER
Junior Member
Posts: 93
|
Post by LUSTER on Jul 13, 2003 17:16:28 GMT -5
Oh don't be sad, I call everyone names. Socialistworker.org?? Wow, why....what...(I'm nearly speechless)..would motivate you to find an article about a millionaire on a socialist website? Think they might be just a little bit biased?
|
|
|
Post by stagetec on Jul 13, 2003 17:26:42 GMT -5
luster lol i just typed in andrew luster name into the internet,and got over 5000 hits.If you would like ill find a news paper,thats not socialist,with the same info.Would that prove the article non biased?
|
|
LUSTER
Junior Member
Posts: 93
|
Post by LUSTER on Jul 13, 2003 17:44:48 GMT -5
Yes, please post something from a credible source, such as a fascist website. Thanks in advance!
|
|
|
Post by stagetec on Jul 13, 2003 17:52:47 GMT -5
luster thanks but don,t know of a fascist web site,do you? ;D
|
|
LUSTER
Junior Member
Posts: 93
|
Post by LUSTER on Jul 13, 2003 17:55:24 GMT -5
Not at the moment, but when I attend my weekly Anarchists meeting tonight I'll ask around....
|
|
|
Post by stagetec on Jul 13, 2003 17:59:27 GMT -5
luster would love to stay and talk,but have to go back to work. good luck at your meeting tonight. LOL
|
|
|
Post by Stupid on Jul 13, 2003 19:03:03 GMT -5
Sherry back to her usual sweet self again I see? It's true, you couldn't BUY a clue. Here, I'll GIVE you one. I don't blow like the wind. I have been changing my mind slowly about Dog, as am beginning to see him for who he really is. As for Luster, I have never changed my mind about him. I admited to ----- that there MIGHT be a chance that he may be "innocent". ----- asked me hypothetical questions and I answered them "hypothetically." Go back and reread if you care to find out what happened. Are you having trouble with your memory? Go take a happy pill and give the rest of us a break. Luster
|
|
|
Post by stagetec on Jul 14, 2003 2:20:46 GMT -5
sherry how come the jury only took 2 hr to find Andrew(WOW A PASSED OUT WOMEN AND I CAN DO ANYTHING I WANT) Luster guilty on 86 out of 87 counts?Must of been lots of great info on the video tapes EH?
|
|