|
|
Post by TheTruth on Aug 5, 2003 20:33:48 GMT -5
I just heard the announcement but I haven't had a chance to see it. It's on MSNBC.
|
|
|
|
Post by TheTruth on Aug 5, 2003 20:59:25 GMT -5
Just as I suspected. Abrams is defending him.  Not a mention of why he was denied the money, his felony status, or the pending criminal charges. I'm taping it all though including his lies about Luster's statements and e-mails. |
|
|
|
Post by TheTruth on Aug 6, 2003 15:07:49 GMT -5
Shepherd Smith just said Dog will be on tomorrow. The producer's name is Mike Strazinski. After seeing the way these people deliberately lie to cover his as-, and continue to repeat their lies and his in the Luster case, I will never believe another thing they say on this or any other story. |
|
|
|
Post by stagetec on Aug 6, 2003 15:38:43 GMT -5
poor,poor truth,whos lieing in the luster case????The news
|
|
|
|
Post by Sherry on Aug 6, 2003 16:51:59 GMT -5
You are so pathetic YUK! You have to be one of the Dog's pups. Nobody else could be that ignorant. Anyone who's been here for the last month and half, read half the posts on this board, or watched any TV coverage of Dog at all knows he is a pathological liar. The proof is right here on this board. I know of several people who have called, e-mailed and faxed the producers of those shows with the facts on Beth's pending felony charges as well as Dog's lies regarding Luster and THIS BOARD, yet they refuse to report what is public record. They have no more credibility than you do and that's zero. Show me one death threat on this board or Dog's and I'll kiss your ass. His lies are well documented here and by his own words on tape. So are those of Tonjia and the other two. Lies are lies no matter the source.
|
|
Yak
Junior Member
Posts: 88
|
Post by Yak on Aug 6, 2003 20:30:56 GMT -5
Agreed sherry,...everyone is lying,....Duane, Beth, Shepard Smith, Mike Strazinski, Abrams, all of the media, producers, guests, yuk, STAGETEC lol, the man on the moon, etc etc. Wait a minute.....is that "your" picture under your name?.   |
|
|
|
Post by TheTruth on Aug 6, 2003 20:57:10 GMT -5
Excuse me! We were HERE. We witnessed his lies PERSONALLY. He lied about the people on this board! Where is there a single death threat here or on the other board?!!!!! Is it not true that he's an 18 time felon, a convicted first degree murderer, and that Beth has 4 felony charges pending in Colorado?! Is ANY OF THAT NOT TRUE? I know for a fact that Saint and others sent the documentation on Dog and Beth to those same producers. That information is all verified and PUBLIC yet they refuse to report it. They continue to feign ignorance about the true facts of the Luster case, about Dog's conduct, and the reason Judge Brodie denied him the money-That makes them LIARS to anybody but a fruitloop groupie like YUK.  |
|
|
|
Post by ----- on Aug 6, 2003 21:00:58 GMT -5
Need the part about this board.  |
|
|
|
Post by stagetec on Aug 7, 2003 0:59:50 GMT -5
truth fact about mr Chapman is trying to hall off luster down in mexico.Lets face fact with fact,its not the with in the borders of the U.S.A. that chapman took luster down.Their are international laws, and mexico law that chapman had to follow.The truth of the matter is chapman is dam lucky the mexico police caught up to them.If chatman had got luster to a plane and back to the good old U.S.A. ,he would be in more hot water then anyone would want. Their are a few cases of this taking place not only in mexico ,but canda too. All that happens is the U.S. gets its man, and then sends the bounty hunter back to that country.As far as luster is concern,all hehad to do is tell the mexican goverment he was in town,and then he might be a free man today,and chatman would still be in a mexicam prison. LMAO over all of this
|
|
|
|
Post by FormerlyAnon on Aug 7, 2003 1:38:51 GMT -5
Hey, Stagetec: You are finally acknowledging that Duane DID violate the laws of Mexico. Still a lawbreaker & CONVICT. As The BIG UNDERWARE stated, shouldn't he be a real man and just turn himself in to face the consequences of his illegal actions? I'm sure you & Y k agree...
|
|
|
|
Post by stagetec on Aug 7, 2003 2:02:24 GMT -5
anon its not about the dog with me. Its all about luster,and what a fool he is.After all my last post said ,all luster had to do ,is tell mexico he was in town,and then not much could of been done,after all mexico protect people from life in prison,weather in the U.S.A. or an nother nation.Luster has to be the bigest fool i have ever herd of.The truth of the matter is the dog is a free man,and luster will spend the rest of his life in prison. LMAO ;D
|
|
|
|
Post by FormerlyAnon on Aug 7, 2003 2:33:36 GMT -5
If that's true, why are you constantly supporting the unlawful behavior of a CONVICT? He may be free, but he is still a wanted fugitive who should be a real man and just turn himself in (credit BIG UNDERWARE). As far as Luster, he was convicted in a mock trial. He has yet to receive a FAIR trial where ALL the evidence is considered. He ran because he knew what he was up against & was scared sseltihs. He would not have gotten caught if he were truly fleeing...
|
|
|
|
Post by FormerlyAnon on Aug 7, 2003 2:40:06 GMT -5
...(cont.)His run was one of confusion, not disappearance. He had ALL the assets and mechanisms at hand to become a new person & still take advantage of his wealth. TheTruth & Sherry have researched and provided more than ample info to warrent mock trial vs fair trial. We are all entitled to a fair trial! Clear your head, know you are innocent, and imagine yourself in his situation. Would you want a REAL FAIR trial? Convince me that you wouldn't...
|
|
|
|
Post by FormerlyAnon on Aug 7, 2003 2:55:04 GMT -5
Hey, YIKYUKYIKEYOKE: Tell me, is there a cure for your malady (you know, HUA syndrome)? Keep hoping and read the above. The man has NOT received a FAIR trial yet. Would you like to be in his situation? Nobody would. Do you honestly believe that he got a FAIR trial? There is just way too much info here to support that position; but, apparently, you STILL have not done your homework YET. Shame shame shame...
|
|
|
|
Post by stagetec on Aug 7, 2003 7:45:57 GMT -5
anon sure it was an unfair trial,lol its all on tape,all you have to do is read the laws,they have been posted many times.As for chatman,his problem ,is just that his.now how long until luster next trial?
|
|
Not a mention of why he was denied the money, his felony status, or the pending criminal charges. I'm taping it all though including his lies about Luster's statements and e-mails. 
