Tino
New Member
Posts: 8
|
Post by Tino on Aug 12, 2003 11:13:08 GMT -5
Luster is where he belongs. Good riddance to the pervert. Keep up the good work, Dog, and maybe someday, we'll be able to put all the freaks out there who are just like him behind bars. Then...and only then...will our mothers, sisters and daughters be safe from low-life trash like Luster.
|
|
|
|
Post by stagetec on Aug 12, 2003 11:22:02 GMT -5
hi tino so you saw the movie? 124 years and luster will never get out of the hole hes in. ;D
|
|
Tino
New Member
Posts: 8
|
Post by Tino on Aug 12, 2003 11:32:14 GMT -5
Dude, I knew he was a pervert WAY before I saw that movie last night. Looks to me like he got off easy with that 124 year sentence. Hopefully, that freak will never see the light of day. Guess his family's money won't help him get out of THIS one, huh? LOL !!!
|
|
|
|
Post by stagetec on Aug 12, 2003 11:35:01 GMT -5
well lets see half of 124 is 62 years,luster would be 102 years old.Do you think he will make it ?
|
|
Tino
New Member
Posts: 8
|
Post by Tino on Aug 12, 2003 11:47:30 GMT -5
LOL !!! You can say goodbye to that freak.
|
|
|
|
Post by stagetec on Aug 12, 2003 11:48:34 GMT -5
yep ;D
|
|
|
|
Post by FormerlyAnon on Aug 13, 2003 2:20:33 GMT -5
Hey, ThrTruth, Sherry, et al: Here we go again. should we assign this FNG to YIKYUKYOKE for orientation/education? No, better yet, TINY-O should go back thru ALL the postings re: FAIR trial, evidence, perjury, case history, etc. brfore he posts any more, An opinion based on a made for TV movie should not be the only source of info on Luster or a CONVICT
|
|
|
|
Post by FormerlyAnon on Aug 13, 2003 2:24:50 GMT -5
Hey, tino: You're backing a law breaking CONVICT who has NOT changed his ways & still acts as if he is above the law. He has ID'd himself as The AntiChrist, not a four legged animal that doesn't deserve that kind of insult. Please read it all for yourself before falling for his evil ways...
|
|
|
|
Post by FormerlyAnon on Aug 13, 2003 2:28:18 GMT -5
...Luster was NOT afforded a FAIR trial where ALL the evidence was allowed in court. The hudge refused to inform the jury of admitted perjury. Several more problems. Know that I am NOT a Luster supporter, just an advocate for a fair and equitable legal system for ALL...
|
|
|
|
Post by stagetec on Aug 13, 2003 9:44:33 GMT -5
hay anon now their you go again.READ TINO SECOND POST,Im sure he can make up his own mind.OH WHAT THE HECK,ZZZZZZ. That was on one of luster tapes,can you name the person?
|
|
Yak
Junior Member
Posts: 88
|
Post by Yak on Aug 13, 2003 10:45:18 GMT -5
Hey Stagetec,....easy on the old girl. ;D Which "one" of her characters would you like to do the....Duhhhh.....research?  ?? ;D |
|
Tino
New Member
Posts: 8
|
Post by Tino on Aug 13, 2003 10:52:00 GMT -5
Thanks for the response in my absence, Stagetec. You've got it exactly right. As previously stated, my opinion of Luster was formulated a long time ago and if I remember correctly, this is still the United States of America and I'm entitled to free speech in a democratic society as guaranteed by a little thing called The First Amendment.
|
|
|
|
Post by FormerlyAnon on Aug 13, 2003 23:11:16 GMT -5
Hey, Tiny: You have the constitution & so SHOULD everyone else. Please review the facts & I'm sure you will agree that Luster was NOT given a FAIR trial. Ask Truth for any specifics & he will accomodate. AFTER a FAIR trial, one of us will be eating our words. IF it's me, I'll take it with arsenic & ketchup. How about you???
|
|
|
|
Post by stagetec on Aug 14, 2003 2:42:06 GMT -5
anon btw what part of this law do you not understand? (4) Where a person is at the time unconscious of the nature of the
act, and this is known to the accused. As used in this paragraph,
"unconscious of the nature of the act" means incapable of resisting
because the victim meets one of the following conditions:
(A) Was unconscious or asleep.
(B) Was not aware, knowing, perceiving, or cognizant that the act
occurred.
(C) Was not aware, knowing, perceiving, or cognizant of the
essential characteristics of the act due to the perpetrator's fraud
in fact.
(D) Was not aware, knowing, perceiving, or cognizant of the
essential characteristics of the act due to the perpetrator's
fraudulent representation that the sexual penetration served a
professional purpose when it served no professional purpose
|
|
|
|
Post by stagetec on Aug 14, 2003 2:54:42 GMT -5
or 289e 17 counts (e) Any person who commits an act of sexual penetration when the
victim is prevented from resisting by any intoxicating or anesthetic
substance, or any controlled substance, and this condition was known,
or reasonably should have been known by the accused, shall be
punished by imprisonment in the state prison for a period of three,
six, or eight years.
All on tape.P.S. this one was all the sex toys the D.A. took from the house,think they were a match on the tapes.You bet ya,and the jury had to sit their and watch ,the two does unconsious,and luster just going at it. Bet ya they just loved that.Any wonder why they only took two hr to convict?
|
|
