|
|
Post by DOGHUNTER on Jul 30, 2003 19:06:53 GMT -5
;D NOT CONDONING LUSTER. BUT WITH THE HELP OF HIS ATTY. WE ARE FILING A MOTION FRIENDS OF THE COURT BREIF. DIAMOND WILL HELP US WITH OUR GOAL AFTER ALL HE NEEDS TO BE PAID AND HIS MONIE IS TIED UP. ;D.
|
|
|
|
Post by TheTruth on Jul 30, 2003 19:59:48 GMT -5
Ohhh....is that all? hmmph....   |
|
Yak
Junior Member
Posts: 88
|
Post by Yak on Jul 30, 2003 20:20:56 GMT -5
His Monie is all tied up?? Who is Monie?? Not more "GHB" and video's we hope.  And Sherry.......it's "conquer"  |
|
|
|
Post by TheTruth on Jul 30, 2003 20:25:28 GMT -5
*sigh in disgust*  Main Entry: con·cur Pronunciation: k&n-'k&r, kän- Function: intransitive verb Inflected Form(s): con·curred; con·cur·ring Etymology: Middle English concurren, from Latin concurrere, from com- + currere to run -- more at CAR Date: 15th century 1 : to act together to a common end or single effect 2 a : APPROVE <concur in a statement> b : to express agreement <concur with an opinion> 3 obsolete : to come together : MEET 4 : to happen together : COINCIDE synonym see AGREE |
|
|
|
Post by Sherry on Aug 3, 2003 13:42:35 GMT -5
Why has Luster changed lawyers like underwear? James Blatt, Joel Isaacson, Frank Lizarraga, Kiana Hillier, Roger Diamond...I can't remember the others...Maybe he settled on Diamond because he is working Pro Bono  Does that explain his lack of zeal or efforts to clean up the jury pool or undo the damage in public opinion? I thought his first criminal lawyer was doing a pretty good job from what I've read. Why did he bail, was it because he knew the fix was in and that he couldn't win no matter what because the judge was in on it? |
|
|
|
Post by DOGHUNTER on Aug 4, 2003 19:47:31 GMT -5
 I HAVE AN A.M. MEETING WITH THE DIAMOND. SHOULD BE INTRESTING. ;D
|
|
I HAVE AN A.M. MEETING WITH THE DIAMOND. SHOULD BE INTRESTING. ;D