|
Post by stagetec on Jul 18, 2003 13:13:30 GMT -5
Did the prosecution go for poor luster jugular vain?That must of been powerful,when one of the victoms was on the stand,watching herself on tape being raped and sodmized.then breaking down crying in the middel of it.Do you think the jury got a clue what happen that night?
|
|
|
Post by Sherry on Jul 18, 2003 13:20:28 GMT -5
No, I don't think they had a clue about anything. They also saw the tape of Tonjia proving consent. The judge wouldn't allow the jury to be told of her lies. What does the histrionic manipulation and display of acting ability of a lying gold-digger prove?
|
|
|
Post by stagetec on Jul 18, 2003 13:27:07 GMT -5
sherry do you need to read the laws on consent again?Ill post them again if need be.We also can look at all the charges aginst luster too.Fact of the matter is the jury tooh only two hours to find luster guilty on 86 counts.
|
|
|
Post by TheTruth on Jul 18, 2003 13:34:47 GMT -5
Because they were mushrooms. They had only what the prosecutors and the corrupt judge would allow them to see to base their decision on. They had no idea what happened in chambers that caused him to run for his life, ST. They took it as an indication of guilt since they had no truthful or accurate information.
|
|
|
Post by stagetec on Jul 18, 2003 13:43:35 GMT -5
Truth I for one think we should lower the lights,pass out popcorn,and cokes,and play all 17 tapes for the jury to see.Bet ya every one would love that one.Did good old Andrew (BOY ILL NEVER DO TIME IN AMERICA) Luster run for his life down in mexico.Lets see waking up ,surfing the waves,eating great food,and going to strip joints picking up hookers?Boy thats lieing low runing for your life.
|
|
|
Post by Stupid on Jul 18, 2003 15:35:09 GMT -5
That's the truth. he thought he was above getting caught. Well, he did get caught, but DOG. That's why the hate him so much. They think money makes them untouchable and better than anyone else. It's the only thing they think about. I say again.... for luster to protest that these women were only out for his money is like Pamela Anderson saying that men only want her for her boobs. I don't buy it.
|
|
|
Post by ----- on Jul 18, 2003 15:51:46 GMT -5
You don't buy it? I think Pam bought them...lol
|
|
|
Post by Stupid on Jul 18, 2003 15:53:54 GMT -5
well, some of us don't have to....
|
|
|
Post by stagetec on Jul 18, 2003 16:34:11 GMT -5
Stupid wow do you have better boobs the Pamela Anderson?? If so would you like to have dinner?
|
|
|
Post by stillLOVEthedog on Jul 18, 2003 16:51:20 GMT -5
LMAO!!
Thats right tec, a jury of his peers; all walks of life, all races, professions, etc.
The knew the deal after seeing all the evidence and testimony. Shame they had to finish the trial with Lusters empty chair there staring justice in the face.
|
|
|
Post by stagetec on Jul 18, 2003 17:01:52 GMT -5
not only was luster found guilty by a jury of his peers,but now he has to fight to get his appeal rights back.HMMMMMMMMM!!!!!!! wonder if that court will look into Mr Luster running for his life down in mexico.LMAO
|
|
|
Post by ----- on Jul 18, 2003 17:37:17 GMT -5
LoveDog,
Howd you sneak in here past me? Geez, like a rash that's keeps popping up all over the place!
(keep the humour, just picking on you) ;D
pick...pick...pick
|
|
|
Post by Stupid on Jul 18, 2003 18:08:20 GMT -5
StageTec, LOL, no mine aren't better than Pamelas! That would be pretty hard to top!
|
|
|
Post by stagetec on Jul 18, 2003 18:15:46 GMT -5
Stupid lol dose this mean that the dinner is off?
|
|
|
Post by Stupid on Jul 18, 2003 18:22:37 GMT -5
LOL! I thought dinner was only if mine were better! Sorry to disappoint.....story of my life....sheesh.
|
|