|
Post by stagetec on Jul 18, 2003 18:24:46 GMT -5
boy just trying to be a up right type of guy,thanks for leting me off the hook. ;D
|
|
|
Post by RELENTLESSONE on Jul 18, 2003 18:25:04 GMT -5
Hey, stagetec: I have a question for you, but first let me repeat that Ido NOT support Luster or the actions he was accused and convicted of. I am NOT a rape supporter. OK??? Q: If, as you say, Luster was running for his life down in Mexico, how - why did he get "caught"? If he was truly running for his life, wouldn't he still be running? He had access to tons of money, false documents, plastic surgeons, any location in the world. He doesn't seem to be all that unintelligent. It seems to me that common sense would suggest that he wasn't really running. With all of his assets he could have easily accomplished that task. These are the actions, more-so, of a very scared and confused individual, not someone bent on completely disappearing. Just something to ponder...
|
|
|
Post by TheTruth on Jul 18, 2003 18:31:46 GMT -5
I agree Anon. I would add that they were those of an innocent who had never had any dealings with the system. He responded with a naivete' that you only find in those who think if they're innocent they have nothing to fear. From his interview with police to his behavior in court and with the media, he just didn't appear to have any idea what he was up against. I suspect that they offered him a plea deal and he refused out of that mistaken notion as well. Everybody calls him stupid, but who could have foreseen the actions of the judge in this case? It's a first in history to my knowledge.
|
|
|
Post by Stupid on Jul 18, 2003 18:44:48 GMT -5
you don't think losing your rights to appeal was stupid? Seems pretty stupid to me. How about hanging out at clubs in mexico and writing down pick up lines after what he was just charges with and what he just fled from? Sounds pretty stupid to me!
|
|
|
Post by TheTruth on Jul 18, 2003 18:49:46 GMT -5
He didn't lose his rights to appeal. You don't even know what he wrote. For all you know it could be another "throw down" by your hero like the plastic cuffs and the 5 body guards. So what if he was going to clubs, is that a crime?
|
|
|
Post by stagetec on Jul 18, 2003 18:56:08 GMT -5
Anon look like Lusters life style did'nt change down in mexico.But you right with all the assets he had ,he could go any place in the world.But the problem with that type of money ,is you think it will buy anyting,and most of all your freedom.Luster knew about the 124 years in the slammer ,if he got taken back to the U.S.He did't think about staying out of sight for a long time.Confused NNNNAAAAAWWWWWWWW!!!!! foolish yes
|
|
|
Post by TheTruth on Jul 18, 2003 18:58:46 GMT -5
Shows what you know Drew lived on an allowance of $50k a year. That's pocket change on the run or in Santa Barbara.
|
|
|
Post by stagetec on Jul 18, 2003 19:02:37 GMT -5
truth your right going to the clubs/strip jonits ,is not against the law.In fact mexico love us spending our money down their.But the big is taht a smart thing to wene your facing 124 years in prison ,in the US.Oh BTW the dog called Luster on his cell and told him he was going to hall him bact to face up to his crimes.With that Luster still went out and lived the high life.
|
|
|
Post by TheTruth on Jul 18, 2003 19:07:10 GMT -5
I can't even keep up with your shyt. For the fiftieth time-LUSTER DID NOT TALK TO HIM ON HIS CELL PHONE OR ANY PHONE. HE DIDN'T HAVE 5 BODYGUARDS AND THERE WERE NO E-MAILS! THOSE ARE ALL MORE OF dOG'S LIES. Everybody here, even his groupies, KNOW he lied about 9 out 10 things in this. The Catherine Crier show proved that to everyone here. If Luster had had a cellphone, don't you think the F.B.I would've triangulated his location? I can't believe I even respond to this crap.
|
|
|
Post by Stupid on Jul 18, 2003 19:08:41 GMT -5
ya, that's exactly what I was trying to say. He just stood out there in the open, even renting a space right next door to the police. He must have thought he could blend in or something. Didn't seem like he was being very careful about any of it.
|
|
|
Post by TheTruth on Jul 18, 2003 19:11:49 GMT -5
ST, you probably believe Luster said, "I know you'd catch me cuz you're the dog." Luster spit on him. You are really one gullible schmuck. I can understand it from the goo goo eyed women, but do you have any balls at all?
|
|
|
Post by Stupid on Jul 18, 2003 19:18:28 GMT -5
Hey, how do you know I'm goo goo eyed? I was doing some research on bounty hunters when, Wha laa, what do I see in the news but Duane Dog Chapman and Andrew Luster. Good timing I guess!
|
|
|
Post by stagetec on Jul 18, 2003 19:18:41 GMT -5
truth their you go again ,name calling,and i love it.Are you passed that crap, your going to get me becaus your the dog.LOl Who did take luster down? Your mad as hell about that are you not?Yhe truth to the matter is luster is where he belongs behind bars,and the right type bars this time.124 years,and appeal rights running out .LMAO
|
|
|
Post by stagetec on Jul 18, 2003 19:20:37 GMT -5
Stupid your goo-goo eyed too,boy dinner is back on
|
|
|
Post by TheTruth on Jul 18, 2003 19:21:34 GMT -5
You do believe that shyt Dude, you need a guardian. You aren't competent to care for yourself.
|
|