|
Post by stillatlarge on Feb 12, 2007 13:04:16 GMT -5
With all this criticism of her it's important to remember she was human. Face it, she was nothing if NOT a whore, albeit a BEAUTIFUL whore, but a victim all the same. If you subscribe to the biblical idea of a "whore", if you even think there is such a thing, then she fit the definition, not to mention a thief. But, would SHE have been doing this, or any of these other things, especially right after the death of Daniel, on her OWN? I hate to think of what all she must've gone through at Stern's hands. I believe he had to have had something over her head besides the millions. The family and Birkhead should've intervened and had a competency hearing in court long before Daniel's death and for sure afterward. www.nationalenquirer.com/celebrity/63777
|
|
|
Post by Sherry on Feb 13, 2007 19:51:54 GMT -5
She set the probate courts on their ear and made a lot of precedent we will all benefit from. Tortious Interference with Inheritance Expectancy makes it possible to recover stolen assets in court. LOL. It's really ironic that gold-digger did that.
|
|