|
|
Post by stagetec on Jul 15, 2003 20:58:07 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by stillLOVEthedog on Jul 15, 2003 21:18:09 GMT -5
Good job Tech, and thanks for the update...maybe all of us should get together one night a week and play chess. That way, we can all discuss the dirty Luster and his oral/anal charges on sleeping victims or just relax and chat.
Just food for thought for everyone.
|
|
|
|
Post by ----- on Jul 15, 2003 21:26:37 GMT -5
Just wondering loveDog, you were talking about protecting kids so much. Now some are asking what you mean from oral and anal descriptions. And they have asked about being cornholed and the like, how do you explain it to yours? Please help...one parent to another....
|
|
|
|
Post by stillLOVEthedog on Jul 16, 2003 9:53:47 GMT -5
No, no, no...
The oral and anal violations were from Luster himself, that is what I was refering to. When his victims (whom he had sex with prior or not) passed out, he helped himself to pretty much any orifice of his choice.
Pretty twisted dude that Luster is.
And some here think that perfectly acceptable? Oh please... case and point, there are people whom look and act perfectly normal, yet are indeed those twisted freaks you read about.
|
|
LUSTER
Junior Member
Posts: 93
|
Post by LUSTER on Jul 16, 2003 9:56:47 GMT -5
there are people whom look and act perfectly normal, yet are indeed those twisted freaks you read about. /\ || || || Sick and Twisted freak, except that I'm sure it doesn't look perfectly normal or anything close. |
|
|
|
Post by stillLOVEthedog on Jul 16, 2003 9:58:19 GMT -5
yeah, thats what I'm saying....
He may look like the man next door, but hey, his actions spoke volumes. Shallow gene pool maybe? I think so.
|
|
|
|
Post by stagetec on Jul 16, 2003 10:24:10 GMT -5
wow made a post here last night,and darn if its not gone.Look like some people don't like the truth about old luster to be told.
|
|
|
|
Post by stagetec on Jul 16, 2003 10:34:09 GMT -5
OK ill try the post again. ----- maybe stilllovethedog was talking about one of the charges luster was found guilty of. that would be section 286f sodomy of an unconscious person. Boy what a nice guy Andrew(OH BOY!!!!! OH BOY!!!! OH BOY!!!!! A PASSED OUT WOMAN AND I CAN DO ANY THING I WANT TO HER) Luster is.
|
|
|
|
Post by ----- on Jul 16, 2003 10:37:21 GMT -5
Stagetec,
Yes, and I am with you on this one. GHB (and I am assuming) lol, would be like being with a blow up doll. The arguments I keep reading is this was a normal practice with this group.
If it was, do you think it just might be possible these women decided to go for some money? Do you think it is possible?
|
|
|
|
Post by stagetec on Jul 16, 2003 10:46:23 GMT -5
----- anything is possible,and maybe that could be true.But their were 17 tapes the police found,and now a 4th girl has filed new charges.If its true their after the money,then luster is a fool for not only keeping the tapes,but just for tapeing them in the first place.
|
|
|
|
Post by ----- on Jul 16, 2003 11:02:08 GMT -5
and for running to Mexico... Thanks for an honest answer.  |
|
|
|
Post by stagetec on Jul 16, 2003 11:05:50 GMT -5
----- i think all luster could do is run to mexico,after all if you look at the law,and see the tapes.Well the man is guilty as sin.
|
|
|
|
Post by TheTruth on Jul 16, 2003 11:06:48 GMT -5
You're not only an idiot, you're a LIAR too. Those charges are from 2001. The gold-digger who came forward only upon hearing of the civil suit was found to be incredible and the police aren't pursuing it. Dream on ST. ;D
|
|
|
|
Post by stillLOVEthedog on Jul 16, 2003 11:09:21 GMT -5
and thanks for the update as well tec...great points, and great info as usual
|
|
|
|
Post by ----- on Jul 16, 2003 11:10:33 GMT -5
Stagetec,
I know the law, but it is my understanding the judge didn't let all the tapes in? The girls(s) knew they were being filmed?
|
|
