|
Post by Stupid on Jul 22, 2003 16:22:48 GMT -5
who are you talking about, jessie?
|
|
Yak
Junior Member
Posts: 88
|
Post by Yak on Jul 22, 2003 18:12:11 GMT -5
Anon......Thanks for your input..... but I never said i agreed with Duanes methods or tactics. All i said was if your in this business, and have played 100% by the books, every time.....your full of it. I would like to help you & sherry out.........which way did you come in???
|
|
|
Post by Sherry on Jul 22, 2003 18:19:55 GMT -5
You first. Bending a technicality for the greater good is one thing. Interfering and obstructin of justice is something else entirely. He has lied repeatedly, fabricating tales of non-existant "evidence", and making preposterous claims such as the one about Luster having 5 bodyguards . I suspect he went further and actually "threw down" the so-called evidence such as the plastic handcuffs. He has gone on national television and claimed to have been getting death threats on this board. There's the door.
|
|
|
Post by RELENTLESSONE on Jul 22, 2003 20:51:46 GMT -5
Hey, Yak: What's that suppose to mean? Is it some kind of slam?? Are you suggesting that I leave this site (censorship) I'm not sure that I understand, so please clarify. I do agree that sometimes you do find yourself in a situation where you need to exceed the speed limit, or drag through a park after curfew, or lie to someone in order to get them to give up hidden info; but, to willfully obstruct justice, to interfere with an ongoing police investigation, to unlawfully hold someone against their will until info or money is delivered, to knowingly kick in third party residence doors, to lie to law enforcement and the public, etc., etc., etc. is genuinely unforgivable and illegal behavior that should not be allowed or tollerated. If these are your ideas of fair play or appropriate behavior, then like I said, get in line with Duane. By the way, you certainly have not had time to review all of the relevant posts throughout this site. Maybe you should so we don't have to repeat ourselves and upset those who have been here and paying attention. Finally, we are fortunate to represent a profession that deserves all the respect that we can generate. It is the attitude and actions of those few who feel they are above and/or beyond the law that tear down that respect. We presently do not have any oversight authority monitorring our activities. Maybe we should in order to cull out the renegades, law breakers, and loose cannons, and CONVICTS. That way we would prevent any further negative publicity...
|
|
Jessie
Junior Member
Posts: 56
|
Post by Jessie on Jul 22, 2003 21:47:19 GMT -5
I am o-pin-ing on something I have very little info. about. One question: if this Luster thing hadn't happened, would you still have this grudge against Dog? One thing I carry with me from wayyyyyy back--you gotta let an ex-felon redeem themselves someway. You can't just keep rubbing someone's nose in their past mistakes. If this thing in Mexico is his worst mistake, I'll side with him over Mexico anyday!
|
|
|
Post by TheTruth on Jul 22, 2003 22:07:27 GMT -5
"I am o-pin-ing on something I have very little info. about." Take a lesson, Stupid. I don't think any of us non-b.e.a.'s would ever have heard of him had it not been for his involvement in the Luster case. He used this situation to promote himself. He stood on the back of what we believe is an innocent man, to raise himself to his present stature and fame. I wouldn't care what his name was, or what his past was. What he has done is despicable in my opinion. He is an opportunistic parasite. You have to understand that he didn't just stop at the "arrest", he participated in the lies and further demonization. He did serious damage to the jury pool with his lies about the plastic handcuffs, the "rape kits", and everything that supposedly happened in Mexico, and just furthering the whole picture of him as a monster. I believe he did that knowingly and maliciously. I personally believe he KNOWS that Luster didn't do anything against anyone's consent. He met Tonjia and apparently has some continuing relationship and contact with her, so I'm pretty sure he has to be aware of the same things we are. It wouldn't make a difference to me if it was someone besides Luster that he did this to. My point is, his evil-doing is NOT in the PAST. He's a lowlife squirrel beneath contempt for telling such lies against ANYONE. IMO
|
|
|
Post by RELENTLESSONE on Jul 22, 2003 22:42:30 GMT -5
Hey, Sherry: You're right. You don't have much info on this subject. Duane is a CONVICT (drug related murder in TX), among others. He unlawfully entered a foreign country under false pretenses and proceeded to violate their laws. He has been operating as a Fugitive Recovery Agent (Billy The Kid Big Bad Bounty Hunter as he likes to put it) unlawfully in and for CO and CA, knowing that he is forbidden by law to do this. He is still attempting to commit a fraud against a CA Court by unlawfully laying claim to a cash bail to which he has no claim. In the process he has continued to submit false information via TV media in order to defraud the people and process involved. He IS a FUGITIVE from justice in another country. So, you can easily see that it is not just the Mexico thing...
|
|
|
Post by DOGHUNTER on Jul 22, 2003 23:55:35 GMT -5
;D concured. ;D
|
|
Yak
Junior Member
Posts: 88
|
Post by Yak on Jul 23, 2003 9:57:30 GMT -5
Hey Anon:...No slam intended, and i do thank you for answering your own questions AGAIN. Questioning MY ideas {which you really don't understand } has nothing to do with this arguement.......so please stop ASSUMING. Reviewing all the relevant posts here shows me nothing more than YOU are constantly REPEATING YOURSELFS and upsetting those who have been here paying attention. Remember, YOUR personal opinion DOES'NT carry anymore weight than anyone else's here.....so pipe down. The profession we BOTH represent should indeed have an oversight authority monitoring activities, but as we both know......that's an old and ongoing subject that has'nt much to with THIS forum either.
|
|
Jessie
Junior Member
Posts: 56
|
Post by Jessie on Jul 23, 2003 13:39:14 GMT -5
Stupid Tried to reply to you but response is error:member does not exist. Guess you're history here. I'll be too Got to avoid toxic websites but cannot get to a new site w/out link.
|
|
|
Post by RELENTLESSONE on Jul 23, 2003 16:14:59 GMT -5
Hey, Yak: You still haven't done your homework, so we really have nothing to discuss. We'll just report you as incomplete and watch you as you follow in those footie steps that you so admire. Cee-ya...wouldn't ever bee-ya!!!
|
|
Yak
Junior Member
Posts: 88
|
Post by Yak on Jul 23, 2003 19:01:41 GMT -5
Hey anon:.....Thanks for answering your own babble again. Lets NOT discuss it, and for goodness sakes......what is "FOOTIE steps"......i think your finished with pampers......and ready for pull ups. You also confused the word, "would'nt" with "could'nt".
Truth: Perhaps Stupid came back with both barrels because of" deletions" and "spelling changes" in her and strategics script. You also state "none of you have ever tucked tail"?? or "resorted to COWARDLY EVASIVE TACTICS" ?? ......... let's go back to " deletions " and "spelling changes". If "THATS" a FAIR FIGHT........you "ARE" liz luster.
My apologies to all the people here that act on a higher mentality level than idiocy.
|
|
|
Post by TheTruth on Jul 23, 2003 19:44:38 GMT -5
There were no deletions on my part or Sherry's, and yet you attack US. That makes about as much sense as everythng else you idiots come up with. They deleted about 20 posts last night of a lot of people other than those two, on BOTH sides. The only thing I know of that disappeared was her stuff about the other site. She was promoting it HERE. See my post under "Why Was Stupid Banned"? I'm not responsible for her actions and I'm NOT coming to her defense any more than I did her poodle god. If you identify so strongly, why don't you join her?
|
|
|
Post by RELENTLESSONE on Jul 23, 2003 21:16:01 GMT -5
Hey, Yuk: No, I wasn't mistaken. I Wouldn't be ya because you, my friend, are a follower and you've chosen the wrong parade. Duane is a CONVICT (drug related murder, albiet some 2 plus decades), but he has NOT changed his habits, behaviors, or attitudes at all. He continues to function outside of the laws of our communities; laws that the people of our societies have established as acceptable standards of behavior. If you are truly an effective Bail Enforcement Agent, I wish you continued and ever growing success. But, please recognize that Duane's actions and behaviors do NOT represent the quasi law enforcement representative that you should be. His actions are those of a renegade, loose cannon that will, unless checked, corrected, or eliminated, will be the beginning of the end to our special and unique industry. Unlike you, I am not attacking you personally. Instead, I am attempting to persuade you into at least looking at the big picture with open eyes and an open mind. Using facts, not opinions, present your side of the issue. I will view it as I wish you to view mine. An honest, open exchange of facts in order to arrive at a successful resolve...
|
|
Yak
Junior Member
Posts: 88
|
Post by Yak on Jul 24, 2003 10:21:32 GMT -5
"Ms" Anon:...Please, lets stop this bickering and get back to business...this is going nowhere. Again, your dictating and not listening. I do NOT condone Waynes actions & behaviors as YOU say i do. I 'm not sure if he is STILL a convict from two plus decades ago though. As you say {Unlike you, I am not attacking you personally}, how could you misprint "Yak" to "Yuk" ??. As i've said before,"YOUR" opinion carries no more weight than "ANYONE ELSES" in this forum, so please, give it a rest....your act is getting stale. So if YOUR really not ready for "pullups" go back to "pampers". And by the way,......who is responsible for deleting "Stagetechs" contri's ??....the same people who have booted "Stupid" ??
|
|