Yak
Junior Member
Posts: 88
|
Post by Yak on Jul 29, 2003 17:41:35 GMT -5
Thank you -----. And also thank you Saint for the research. Drop one strike against Duane girls. ;D
|
|
|
Post by Sherry on Jul 29, 2003 17:47:46 GMT -5
So what, you're still 40-Love on everything else. lol
|
|
|
Post by stagetec on Jul 29, 2003 17:49:36 GMT -5
40-love whatch out yak she is on to you
|
|
Yak
Junior Member
Posts: 88
|
Post by Yak on Jul 29, 2003 17:59:17 GMT -5
Sherry.....Your "losing" it again. You have only answered me "once".......and also twisted it, {because of "NO COMMITMENT"}..... which really does'nt say much much for "your" intellegence either. And if you "forgot" my question......how come you answered it. Let "ms anon"" answer" for herself please. We're learning more from "Stagetech" than you and ms anon put together in "all" your ramblings together.... and that would "only" would "take" 4 threads.
|
|
Yak
Junior Member
Posts: 88
|
Post by Yak on Jul 29, 2003 18:02:07 GMT -5
Yeah Stage......On to ME......or on SOMETHING.... geezzzzzzzz!!!!!!!
|
|
|
Post by stagetec on Jul 29, 2003 20:55:03 GMT -5
yak let poor sherry win one,after all if luster loses his civil lawsuit,hes in a deeper hole,that he can't dig himself out of.
|
|
LUSTER
Junior Member
Posts: 93
|
Post by LUSTER on Aug 3, 2003 15:01:03 GMT -5
Nice to see some things never change. Yak and stagetec are still morons!
|
|
Yak
Junior Member
Posts: 88
|
Post by Yak on Aug 3, 2003 20:04:24 GMT -5
Happy to see "somethings" nice in your life for a change "lusty". Read "cherrys" jokes.........I'm sure you'll come back down and be "unhappy" again after reading them.
|
|
|
Post by FormerlyAnon on Aug 3, 2003 23:24:37 GMT -5
Hey, Y k: During my absence, Sherry & TheTruth were watching my back & authorized to answer for me. I'm here, now. Lose the HUA Syndrom and ask me something intellegent. Please don't just opine w/out facts to back it up, though!!!
|
|
|
Post by stagetec on Aug 4, 2003 0:08:09 GMT -5
yak think luster is trying to pick a fight.
|
|
|
Post by TheTruth on Aug 4, 2003 15:33:41 GMT -5
I don't think they're even gonna break even in the civil suit. The lawyer will take half, and unless the judge rules in their favor tomorrow, there is almost nothing there to take, considering it will be split at least 5 ways. ;D Serves them right. Luster should be suing THEM.
|
|
|
Post by stagetec on Aug 4, 2003 16:10:40 GMT -5
Truth lol their you go again ,with whos going to get the money.In civil cases any criminal convictions relives the burden of proving intent.Plus all the does could split up any money lusters earns in the slammer.Think about it truth luster is about to get his first full time job.LMAO Plus a civil ruling ,will mean one thing,a court of law has again called luster a low life rapeist.
|
|
|
Post by TheTruth on Aug 4, 2003 17:55:02 GMT -5
That's ludicrous. What does "intent" have to do with the preponderance in a civil suit? Even if they win by default, which is what's going to happen, they get peanuts. There is nothing there. A judgement and enforcement of the judgeme nt are two very different things. They could get a judgement for millions and never collect a dime. You don't know shyt ST.
|
|
|
Post by stagetec on Aug 4, 2003 19:16:26 GMT -5
truth now their you go again.Sure i know that ,take a look at the Simpson Civial case.Mr Goldman won millions of dollare ,but got very little in return.In fact simpson still gets his 25,000 a month retirement ,from the NFL,And Goldman can" get a dime of it.But i can run around ,and call O.J. a low life murder,because he lost his civil case.Like I said,i Don't give a hoot about who gets the money. Its about Andrew Luster,has one more nail in his cofifin,and again has been found guilty buy a court of law.Of the crime of rape.
|
|
|
Post by DOGHUNTER on Aug 4, 2003 19:56:51 GMT -5
;D I SEE YOUR STAND ON THE ISSUE. CIVIL REPROCUSIONS HAVE LITTLE BERING ON THE CRIMINAL ISSUES. O.J. GREAT EXAMPLE. BUT WITH LUSTER. THE MONEY IS HELD IN TRUST. AS O'J. 25K PER MONTH. KINDA LIKE A LIVING TRUST. A SMART MOVE BY HIS ATTY. THIS CASE. (LUSTER ) $$ IN TRUST BY THE COURT. AND MOTIONS HAVE TO BE HEARD, DOGS IS MUTE. AGAIN I SAY THE NO FELON ACT. P.C.1299. AND HIS OWN ACTIONS AND NO RESPONCE TO MEXICO. SHOW THE COURTS DOGS CREDIBILITY. AND THAT SHALL BE A POINT FOR THE CONCIL AND PETETIONERS OF THE MONEY. ;D
|
|